Levi's® Vintage Clothing
1950's 701® Women's Jeans
Sale price is$215.98Original Price Was $255.00
Size
Select Quantity
1
Free shipping for Red Tab™ members on orders $50+ through 5/18.
Shipping & Returns
About this Style
In 1934, we introduced the first five-pocket jean especially built for women: the 701®. Made famous by the premiere American fashion magazine of its time, the 701® had a distinctly high-waisted, more curved fit.
Today, we reproduced this glossy-magazine-approved fit stitch-for-stitch using premium (pink line!) selvedge denim.
- A recreation of the first ever five-pocket jean designed and crafted especially for women
- Made with a distinct high-waisted fit designed especially to flatter
- Crafted from a dark wash pink line selvedge denim
- Finished with a cloth Levi's® back patch and big “E" Red Tab™
- Curved silhouette
- High rise
- Straight leg
- Front rise: 13”
- Leg opening: 17”
- Inseam: 34"
- Measurements based on size 27 waist
- 100% cotton
- 10 oz pre-shrunk pink selvedge denim
- Non-stretch
- Talon zipper fly
- Back pockets with concealed rivets
- Wash and dry inside out with like colors
- Liquid detergent is recommended
- Shrinkage in wash approximately 5%
- Imported
Styles You May Like
Reviews
Customer Images and Videos
Filter Reviews
Rating
Height
Weight
Body Type
Language
41 to 64 of 64 Reviews
41 – 64 of 64 Reviews
Highest to Lowest Rating
Review 1
5 out of 5 stars.
Magnifique jean
9 years ago
Jean très féminin par sa taille haute et ses multiples détails raffinés. Très satisfaite de mon achat. Taille un peu grand.
Translate with GoogleYes, I recommend this product.
Originally posted on 1950's 701® Women's Jeans - Rigid
Fit, 5 out of 7, where 1 equals to Very Small and 7 equals to Very Big
Amsterdam
Review 1
5 out of 5 stars.
Heb normaal maat 27 van dit model een maat 25
9 years ago
Sluit perfect aan in de taille.
Alleen jammer dat er geen lengte maat 32 van deze jeans is!
Bij een kleinere maat is de broek heel erg lang.
Ondanks dat ben ik dolgelukkig met deze Jeans!
Translate with GoogleYes, I recommend this product.
Originally posted on 1950's 701® Women's Jeans - Rigid
Fit, 7 out of 7, where 1 equals to Very Small and 7 equals to Very Big
Bochum
Review 1
5 out of 5 stars.
Sehr gute PASSFORM
10 years ago
SEHR GUT,Verarbeitung ist hervorragend. Eine super Qualität.
Translate with GoogleYes, I recommend this product.
Originally posted on 1950's 701® Women's Jeans - Rigid
Fit, 4 out of 7, where 1 equals to Very Small and 7 equals to Very Big
Review 1
Weight120-140
Body TypeSlender
4 out of 5 stars.
Nice cut but fit big
3 years ago
Nice pair of vintage style jeans that fit me well and are really flattering for women's curves. Sadly I'm having to exchange them for a size smaller as they fit quite big. The length is perfect if you like turn-ups. To call the fabric rigid is wrong though, as they're not rigid at all, which seeing as they're pre-shrunk is not ssurprising.Overall, I'm very happy with them.
Q: Size Usually Worn
A: 29 or 30
Q: Size Purchased
A: 29, exchanging for 28
Yes, I recommend this product.
Originally posted on 1950's 701® Women's Jeans - Rigid
Fit, 5 out of 7, where 1 equals to Very Small and 7 equals to Very Big
Review 1
Weight120-140
Body TypeSlender
4 out of 5 stars.
Great style, weird sizing.
3 years ago
Based on the reviews and availability, I bought a smaller size. It's a bit snug in the waist, so they'll need to be altered. The fit is otherwise perfect. I love the style!
Q: Size Usually Worn
A: 28
Q: Size Purchased
A: 27
Yes, I recommend this product.
Originally posted on 1950's 701® Women's Jeans - Home Cooked Blue
Fit, 4 out of 7, where 1 equals to Very Small and 7 equals to Very Big
LYON
Review 1
Weight100-120
4 out of 5 stars.
Coupe OK
7 years ago
Ai été déçu par l'aspect du tissu je m'attendais à celui des jeans des années 60.
Le reste me convient
Translate with GoogleYes, I recommend this product.
Originally posted on 1950's 701® Women's Jeans - Rigid
Fit, 4 out of 7, where 1 equals to Very Small and 7 equals to Very Big
luzern
Review 1
Weight140-160
4 out of 5 stars.
schönejeans
7 years ago
die 701 jeans ist perfekt für mich.
einzig die grössenangaben sind jenseits von gut und böse....
Translate with GoogleYes, I recommend this product.
Originally posted on 1950's 701® Women's Jeans - Rigid
Fit, 6 out of 7, where 1 equals to Very Small and 7 equals to Very Big
Review 1
4 out of 5 stars.
Un buen vaquero pero nada que ver con la foto
8 years ago
La calidad es excelente pero no tiene nada que ver con la foto.
La talla es más grande de lo esperado y la largura 34.
Los compré porque me gustó que la largura quedase por encima del tobillo, mi sorpresa fue que son 34 de largura.
Para el precio que tienen una no espera tener que llevarlos a acortar.
Translate with GoogleOriginally posted on 1950's 701® Women's Jeans - Rigid
Fit, 6 out of 7, where 1 equals to Very Small and 7 equals to Very Big
Review 1
4 out of 5 stars.
Jeans parfait mais beaucoup de longueurs sur les jambes
9 years ago
Ce jean est magnifique, j'adore la coupe vintage et la taille haute. Aucuns défauts de couture ou autres et la taille est excellente.
Seul problème : la longueur des jambes est énorme. Le modèle sur la photo semble avoir des revers de 5/6cm, je dois en faire de 10/12 au mien afin de pouvoir le mettre (et pourtant je suis assez grande 170cm).
Sinon, rien à redire. La qualité de ce jean est top.
Translate with GoogleYes, I recommend this product.
Originally posted on 1950's 701® Women's Jeans - Rigid
Fit, 5 out of 7, where 1 equals to Very Small and 7 equals to Very Big
Review 1
Weight120-140
3 out of 5 stars.
Very cute but TINY
2 years ago
Very cute and I was so excited, but they run unbelievably small. I ordered a size up from my usual so they would have a relaxed look and I couldn’t get them over my thighs! Reordered 3 sizes up from my usual so hopefully those will work!
Q: Size Usually Worn
A: 26
Q: Size Purchased
A: 27
Originally posted on 1950's 701® Women's Jeans-Anza
Fit, 1 out of 7, where 1 equals to Very Small and 7 equals to Very Big
Response from Levi’s®:
2 years ago
Levi's Customer Support
Thank you for getting in touch. Our goal is to cater to various body types and preferences. We recommend checking out our Men’s and Women’s Jeans Guide for detailed information on each fit, or you can reach out to our customer service team for a personalized style consultation. We intentionally design our jeans to have varying proportions, including oversized, cropped, and slim fits, even within the same size. Additionally, minor differences in fabric treatment, finishing, or composition can also impact the fit of each pair of jeans. Keep in mind that each individual's body shape will also affect how a pair of jeans fit.
We just wanted to let you know that we offer a 60-day exchange policy where you can exchange your item(s) for a different size, completely free of charge. If you have any more questions, our Help Center has more information, so feel free to check it out. As a bonus, Red TabTM Members receive free shipping and returns! You can sign up Here, or check if you're already a member.
Reviews 2
Weight120-140
Body TypePetite
3 out of 5 stars.
Too small
2 years ago
Runs really small. I ordered 29 which is my usual and I think I have to send it back and ask for 2 size larger
Q: Size Usually Worn
A: 29
Q: Size Purchased
A: 29
Originally posted on 1950's 701® Women's Jeans-Anza
Fit, 1 out of 7, where 1 equals to Very Small and 7 equals to Very Big
Response from Levi’s®:
2 years ago
Levi's Customer Support
Hello, thanks for reaching out. Our goal is to provide a diverse range of fits that cater to everyone. We suggest reviewing our Men’s and Women’s Jeans Guide for comprehensive information on each fit or reaching out to customer service for personalized style recommendations. Our jeans are deliberately designed to vary in size, with some being intentionally oversized, cropped, or slimmer, even within the same size range. Additionally, slight alterations to fabric treatment, finishing, or composition can influence the fit of a pair of jeans. Moreover, each pair of jeans may fit individuals differently.
Also, just so you know, we have a 60-day exchange policy where you can exchange your item(s) for a different size, free of charge**. If you have any questions, please feel free to visit our Help Center for more information. And hey, if you're not already a Red TabTM Member, sign up Here to enjoy free shipping and returns.
Review 1
Weight100-120
Body TypeAthletic
3 out of 5 stars.
Not for me
3 years ago
I was super excited for this pair but unfortunately it just wasn't for me. The length wasn't too much of an issue, but I expected the fabric to be a bit softer, and this particular pair is definitely designed for figures without too much of a waist to hip ratio.
Originally posted on 1950's 701® Women's Jeans - Worn In Blue
Response from Levi’s®:
3 years ago
Levi's Customer Support
Thanks for your feedback, it's super important to us! We’ll make sure it ends up in the right hands.
Our designers carefully consider every detail when designing something, and every choice they make is for a reason, whether they’ve got functionality in mind, are trying to give our customers something they’ve been asking for, or are following their inspiration. That being said, the same pair of jeans will fit everyone a little differently!
So you know, we have a 60-day return policy if you’re not satisfied with your product. And, you can always find more information at https://help.levi.com/hc/en-us, or start a chat with us on the bottom right of the help center if you’d like further assistance!
Long Beach
Review 1
Weight120-140
Body TypeAthletic
3 out of 5 stars.
Not what I expected.
4 years ago
Rather frumpy fit. I have actual dead stock jeans from the 50s and 60s and they are far more flattering. Maybe I could size down (sold out), but there's just too much room in the crotch/rise. Makes me look like I have a fupa. A bit pricey. Shipping was slow. Going to return.
Q: Size Usually Worn
A: 26-27 (2-4)
Q: Size Purchased
A: 27
No, I do not recommend this product.
Originally posted on 1950's 701® Women's Jeans - Rigid
Fit, 5 out of 7, where 1 equals to Very Small and 7 equals to Very Big
Colorado
Reviews 2
Weight120-140
Body TypeSlender
3 out of 5 stars.
Great fabric!
6 years ago
I loved the denim in these jeans. Classic denim of the best quality. The waist was just too too high for me. Please make other Jean styles with this type and weight of denim.
Q: Size Usually Worn
A: 29
Q: Size Purchased
A: 29
No, I do not recommend this product.
Originally posted on 1950's 701® Women's Jeans - Rigid
Fit, 4 out of 7, where 1 equals to Very Small and 7 equals to Very Big
Paris
Review 1
3 out of 5 stars.
Mauvais rapport qualité / prix
8 years ago
Il taille petit (il m’a fallu prendre 1 taille 26 alors que je prends du 24 pour le 501 ou le 505)
On ne peut pas choisir la longueur des jambes et celles-ci sont tres longues ! Oblgée de faire un ourlet, ce qui n’est pas top !
Seul avantage sa vraie taille haute qu’on ne trouve pas dans les « taille haute » de Levis
Ce jean est donc excessivement cher par rapport aux autres marques
Translate with GoogleNo, I do not recommend this product.
Originally posted on 1950's 701® Women's Jeans - Rigid
Fit, 1 out of 7, where 1 equals to Very Small and 7 equals to Very Big
New York, NY
Review 1
3 out of 5 stars.
Good fit, but did not get big E red tab as advertise
8 years ago
I was so happy that Levi's is making raw denim for women, especially in this 701 vintage fit. When my order arrived, first thing I noticed was I got the regular small e red tab instead of the vintage big E red tab as stated on the website. I contacted the customer service(both live chat and email) since last Thursday and still heard nothing from them(they said they will get back within 24 hours). Fit is good but very disappointed that levi's does not pay attention to small but important detail, and does not care to get back to the customer.
Originally posted on 1950's 701® Women's Jeans - Rigid
Fit, 4 out of 7, where 1 equals to Very Small and 7 equals to Very Big
Review 1
2 out of 5 stars.
Poor sizing
2 years ago
Looked ok but couldn't pull them past my hips. Not sure what features justified the original price, vintage or not, but never got to wear them.
Originally posted on 1950's 701® Women's Jeans - Yerba Buena
Response from Levi’s®:
2 years ago
Levi's Customer Support
Hello, thanks for reaching out. Our goal is to provide a diverse range of fits that cater to everyone. We suggest reviewing our Men’s and Women’s Jeans Guide for comprehensive information on each fit or reaching out to customer service for personalized style recommendations. Our jeans are deliberately designed to vary in size, with some being intentionally oversized, cropped, or slimmer, even within the same size range. Additionally, slight alterations to fabric treatment, finishing, or composition can influence the fit of a pair of jeans. Moreover, each pair of jeans may fit individuals differently.
Also, just so you know, we have a 60-day exchange policy where you can exchange your item(s) for a different size, free of charge**. If you have any questions, please feel free to visit our Help Center for more information. And hey, if you're not already a Red TabTM Member, sign up Here to enjoy free shipping and returns
Review 1
2 out of 5 stars.
DON'T SIZE UP!!!!
2 years ago
Me: 5'7" 140 lbs, 28.5 waist, 41" hips, VERY long waisted. I own the raw denim version of these jeans in a 28 and 27 (28 is form fitting but with a bit of space, and the 27s are snug everywhere)
For these jeans the reviews said to size up, so I went from my usual 28 to a 29 and I regret it. When I first put these on they felt perfect, not crazy tight, but not at all too big. After wearing these for an hour or 2 they had loosened up considerably especially in the waist, and by evening they were straight up too big, and not in a cute way. Because the rise is so high on these, once they start to sag then the whole vibe is off, and the crotch is too long, which makes the belly poof out on me , and I ended up with probably like 5 inches of extra fabric in the waist.
Important note: the denim on these is VERY THIN. Like chambray shirt thin. These are not going to stand up to wear and tear at all. And when you look inside to see how the "patches" are sewn in, none of the edges are finished. It's just one single row of stitching and then fraying chambray as the only thing holding these giant patches in place (that on these jeans are integral to the structural stability of you actually wearing pants).
So yeah, they are kind of cute, but I can't imagine how to actually buy the right size that looks good when you put them on AND still looks good at the end of the day. I definitely would not pay full price for these. My opinion is that you fork over the big bucks and get the raw denim 701s because those are worth it. Those are real denim, sewn with proper attention to detail, and will look better every time you wear them. Skip these. And Levi's: Try a little harder to be more consistent with your quality, you are blowing it with some of these styles.
Originally posted on 1950's 701® Women's Jeans-Anza
Response from Levi’s®:
2 years ago
Levi's Customer Support
Hey there,
We're sorry to hear that your experience with our product didn't meet your expectations. At Levi's, we strive to deliver high-quality products that our customers love, and we're sorry that we fell short this time.
So you know, we have a 60-day exchange policy where you can exchange your item(s) for a different size, free of charge**. Please visit our Help Center for more information if you have any more questions. Free shipping and Returns for Red TabTM Members. Sign up Here or check and see if you’re already a Member.
Southern Pines,NC
Review 1
Weight120-140
Body TypeCurvy
2 out of 5 stars.
These might be cool if you are 6' tall
3 years ago
These were pretty (and expensive) jeans. Very high waisted and very long! I returned them after trying them on, sadly.The fabric was soft and I was hopeful and even willing to have these altered, but the waist was almost under my chest.
Q: Size Usually Worn
A: 29
Q: Size Purchased
A: 30
No, I do not recommend this product.
Originally posted on 1950's 701® Women's Jeans - Worn In Blue
Fit, 4 out of 7, where 1 equals to Very Small and 7 equals to Very Big
Response from Levi’s®:
3 years ago
CSR2
Thanks for your feedback, it's super important to us! We’ll make sure it ends up in the right hands.
We try to make a wide variety of fits for everyone — and we definitely recommend looking through our Men’s Jeans Guide and Women’s Jeans Guide to get all of the information you need about each one. Often, we intentionally construct our jeans to be oversized, cropped or slimmer, even within a given size. And sometimes, something as small as a change in fabric treatment, finishing, or composition can affect the way a pair of jeans fits. Not to mention that each pair of jeans will fit everyone a little differently!
We’re happy to hear that you took advantage of our return policy — that’s why we have one! And so you know, you can always find more information at https://help.levi.com/hc/en-us, or start a chat with us on the bottom right of the help center if you’d like further assistance!
Half moon bay
Review 1
Weight140-160
Body TypeCurvy
2 out of 5 stars.
Two sizes too tiny
6 years ago
These are so classically chic but alas the size 28 I usually wear in jeans didn’t stretch to my advantage. When I pulled them
Out of the box I noticed the waist was about 22 inches and after squeezing them
On there was no give. Too bad cause they’re so flattering. I tried to order up online but they are sold out. If they restock I might try again.
Q: Size Usually Worn
A: 28 size 6
Q: Size Purchased
A: 28
No, I do not recommend this product.
Originally posted on 1950's 701® Women's Jeans - Rigid
Fit, 2 out of 7, where 1 equals to Very Small and 7 equals to Very Big
Review 1
WeightPrefer Not To Answer
Body TypeAthletic
1 out of 5 stars.
Nope.
2 years ago
Fabric felt thin upon arrival and wore through within 10 wears and 2 washes. I ended up sending to a 3rd party for repairs and she said they were very poorly made Levi’s.
Q: Size Usually Worn
A: 27-28
Q: Size Purchased
A: 28
Originally posted on 1950's 701® Women's Jeans - Yerba Buena
Fit, 4 out of 7, where 1 equals to Very Small and 7 equals to Very Big
Review 1
1 out of 5 stars.
These run about one - two sizes too small
2 years ago
These run small and do not run true to size. I usually west a size 25 across Levi’s and these fit me super tight in the waist . Unfortunately these were final sale and I cannot return them.
Originally posted on 1950's 701® Women's Jeans - Yerba Buena
Response from Levi’s®:
2 years ago
Levi's Customer Support
Hey there! We're glad you're here.
At Levi's, we know that even the smallest details can impact the fit of your jeans - like changes in fabric treatment and finishing or the composition of the fabric itself. But don't worry, we're constantly striving to make our fits as consistent as possible.
We appreciate you bringing this to our attention and we'll make sure to take note of it. Thanks for being a part of the Levi family.
Minnesota
Review 1
Weight140-160
Body TypeHourglass
1 out of 5 stars.
Great material but 2 sizes too small!
6 years ago
Just purchased these and ordered the size 30 as I normally wear size 10's or 30's in Levi's and I couldn't even get the 30's past my thighs and they don't come any larger! Why LEVI"S WHYYYY? I'm not a big person but I do have hips and a butt. Super bummer because I REALLY wanted to be able to exchange for a larger size.
Q: Size Usually Worn
A: 10 or 30
Q: Size Purchased
A: 30
Originally posted on 1950's 701® Women's Jeans - Rigid
Fit, 1 out of 7, where 1 equals to Very Small and 7 equals to Very Big
Review 1
1 out of 5 stars.
Too heavy
6 years ago
I didn't like it. So heavy and stiff. Returned it.
Originally posted on 1950's 701® Women's Jeans - Rigid
41 – 64 of 64 Reviews