Nice jeans, good fit. Much more hypocritical. I bought one size smaller than usual.

they have a classic fit that feels relaxed but not baggy, they have a timeless feel to then and i adore the color and how it looks greyish in the dark but dark green in the light

I ordered this in a size 36 because I like a looser fit on the waist but it fits more like a 38. Overall, perfect length and bagginess on the legs.

This is currently listed as Levi's Premium, but it isn't part of that line. Levi's confirmed this in a chat and said they would correct it. They still haven't, so here's a review for consumer transparency. This is a standard line jean. That means a basic overlock seam on the outer leg instead of the busted seam common to the Premium line. Fabric is thin (10-11 oz?). Lower case e on the red tag, paper label, and not just because it's a '90s homage. Stitch lengths are long at 6-8 threads per inch across the garment. Positives: It's 100% cotton. Waist dimensions on my 32" are more consistent than a lot of Levi's at 32.5" after one wash. Fit: The '97 565 has a slim thigh compared to other "Loose Straight," the 568. My 32" is 11.5" measured 3" down the inseam. For people who order loose cuts to fit big thighs, the 568 and 578 are your only bigger Levi's options, and the 578 looks a bit silly with the thigh almost full. They're not terrible, but they simply aren't what was advertised. The lack of transparency, accuracy, and consistency regarding quality, materials, and sizing is eroding Levi's position as "the default option." Especially with the shift away from 100% cotton products as a denim company. Good products exist in Levi's catalog, but it's become very hard to justify the standard line over something like the Cowboy Cut in this market segment. And ordering the premium+ stuff is harder to justify when you don't know what you're going to get.